Why is Eminent Domain Legal?

The legality of eminent domain goes all the way back to the Roman Empire. However, American law has recognized the right of eminent domain as an inherent power that precedes any government statute and even the Constitution. The recognition that the courts have given eminent domain is important to note in both the federal context and state context.

            Under Federal Law, the United States Supreme Court first recognized the ability of the Federal government to exercise eminent domain in Kohl v. United States. In that case, the Federal government exercised its right of eminent domain to condemn property for use as a custom house and post office. The Court in that case stated that eminent domain for public use is “essential to its independent existence and perpetuity.”

The Court, a few years later in Boom Co. v. Patterson, also confirmed the Federal government’s right to exercise eminent domain. In that case, the United States Supreme Court stated that the eminent domain “requires no constitutional recognition; it is an attribute of sovereignty.” The Federal government’s ability to exercise eminent domain is an inherent right that has gone unquestioned by the courts although challenged by property owners.

The states have a similar basis for exercising eminent domain. In North Carolina, the power of eminent domain is considered an inherent right that the state may exercise for the public benefit. The North Carolina Supreme Court stated in State v. Core Banks Club Properties, Inc.  that, “The right to take private property for public use, the power of eminent domain, is one of the prerogatives of a sovereign state. The right is inherent in sovereignty; it is not conferred by constitutions.” This is a similar concept to the Federal government’s ability to exercise eminent domain.

However, since the government is sovereign, the government can confer on other entities the ability to exercise eminent domain. In North Carolina, the General Assembly has passed laws that allow specific private entities to exercise eminent domain. Therefore, the private entities may exercise eminent domain because the government has the right to exercise it.

Our firm focuses on three practice areas: Disability, Personal Injury, and Eminent Domain. Every practice area has attorneys who have expertise in their respective area of practice. 

Chad Brown is a North Carolina Board Certified Social Security disability law specialist. Mr. Brown helps Social Security disability claimants at all stages of the disability process. He also works with people that have Long Term Disability denials and with people that are injured by drugs and defective medical products.

Your Questions Answered

What Is the Public Good for Purposes of Eminent Domain?

The question above asks a question that seems to coincide with one of the two main restrictions that the constitution places on the government before it can take private property. However, what is being referred to here as “public good” is actually referred to as...

read more

Can Eminent Domain Be Used for Economic Development?

This question was brought to many Americans’ attention in 2005 after the decision for Kelo v. New London was handed down by the United States Supreme Court. In that case, the Court stated that government could condemn property and convey it to private entities for...

read more

Can Eminent Domain Be Challenged?

The state and federal government do have the inherent right to exercise eminent domain. This inherent right is not expressly given in either the United States Constitution or the North Carolina Constitution. However, those documents do act to restrict the government’s...

read more